(Hattip Hog)
The chief executive of Toll Brothers Inc., the nation's largest luxury-home builder, said Wednesday the housing industry is in a "depression" and any recovery could be two or three years away.And Minyanville has a statement from Pulte's CEO:
In candid remarks at the JPMorgan Basics & Industrials Conference a day after reporting a second-quarter loss, Robert Toll said he's not ready to call a bottom yet since the housing market could still get worse.
"Can the market go down another ten or twenty percent? Sure," said Toll, whose Horsham-based company will sit on cash unless a bargain land deal comes along.
He said the current housing crisis is the worst he's seen since the mid-1970s, but back then the decline was relatively short-lived. The current downturn started in late 2005.
"Maybe '74 and '75 was just as bad, but it was so short," Toll said.
Buyers' lack of confidence that home prices will stop sliding is what's keeping them out of the market, rather than lack of access to credit, he said.
Richard Dugas, [Pulte Home] CEO, said he believes it is a mistake to believe the new housing market can correct without the resale market also correcting. This is an important point of distinction. New homes are now selling at a 10% to 15% discount to resale in most areas of the country. Historically, that ratio has been reversed.
"We clearly need resale pricing to correct, and correct dramatically,' Dugas said. He cited the most recent data from the S&P/Case-Shiller index showing a 14% decline in prices year-over-year, by far the largest on record, but noted that even that kind of decline is not enough.
"We view that [price decline] as a good thing," Dugas said, "and frankly we think resale pricing needs to continue to move down, because existing buyers are telling us they would like to buy our homes, but need to sell their existing homes, but they've obviously got to get realistic about price before they have a chance to sell those homes."
16 comments:
Nah, this is just a normal cycle...
Seriously though, it is interesting to hear these guys being more honest about just how far from the bottom we are.
New-Home Construction Drops Most Since 1980
By Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 18, 2008; Page D01
U.S. home construction last year plummeted at a rate not seen since 1980
I guess if you're only in your mid-20s and you weren't around to experience it the last time it happened as part of a normal cycle, then it didn't happen!
Nope we didn't have an (actually worse) decline in 1980 ... and we didn't end up okay afterwards ... 'cause it never happened ...
Now Lance knows more than the CEO of Toll Brothers. If only he had listened to Lance then there would be no decline.
Will it rain tomorrow lance? Do I look better in blue or red? Which is the one true religion?
Jan 18?
Why repost a 6 month old article?
So you could make some attempt at being clever?
Here is a story from today...
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. home builders, struggling under sinking demand and a credit crisis, now face a fresh obstacle: competition from a flood of homes in foreclosure.
Grappling with the worst U.S. housing market downturn since the Great Depression, home builders have curbed their building activities. "
...but hey, I guess if you are only in your mid 70s and you weren't around to experience it the last time it happened as part of a NORMAL CYCLE, then it didn't happen!
You are welcome to join us in the real world any time you like.
When I started reading the HouseBubbleBlog a couple of years ago, folks had fun pointing out that Toll was speaking out of both sides of his mouth: while pumping real estate to the public he was quietly selling his stock. Is he being honest now?
Ralph,
He wants the government to offer incentives to buy homes to get his business sparked back up.
Here's something to lighten up the Blog.
Enjoy.
Hope I got it right.
John,
thanks. Figures. Hope his company goes bankrupt. I don't think that society should provide incentives to people so that can build luxury houses.
I don't support incentives to build any type of properties, but if my tax dollars are going to be used to build housing, I rather it be luxurous than sparse. I mean if my tax dollars are going into providing housing, I want my money to help raise the standard of our country's housing ... and not lower it. Ralph, why would you not want that too?
Before you answer that ... think back at what we had a hundred years or so ago ... and look at what was then considered "luxury housing" ... Luxury housing was a house with indoor plumbing and maybe electricity. This was high end. Most people didn't have those things in their houses. The more housing we build with "luxury" in mind, the more this "luxury" housing becomes available to the common man and woman. How can that be a bad thing?
Ralph,
Excellent point on Toll. We won't know if he's exaggerating until his company or another big builder actually goes under. (I remember his quote "pinch me, I must be dreaming" about his profits in about 2005, right when things were about to change). Still, the builders are more interesting than the NAR spokesman.
Lance,
I think "luxury" housing a builder tries to sell is all in the pretty finishes and square footage and not in the quality or energy-efficiency of the construction. I was just reading about how quickly houses are burning down in Loudoun -- six firefighters injured.
Lance,
I don't support incentives to build any type of properties
Assuming "any type" means residential, we're generally in agreement.
if my tax dollars are going to be used to build housing, I rather it be luxurious than sparse.
We don't agree anymore. No, government shouldn't subsidize any type of "move up" housing, least of all luxury. First, it artificially inflates the value. Second, incomes & cost-of-living should dictate lifestyle, not subsidies. Especially when we're approaching a $10 trillion public debt.
I'm just not a fan of the overly big house, the type Toll tends to build. There is nothing impressive about them. Harriet's got it right: big doesn't equal quality. I'd rather have quality. Even with a family of 5, I'd rather have a rock-solid, energy efficient 1700 sq ft house than a 4000 sq ft paper mache Toll-house.
Harriet,
Yeah, I don't know how those NAR folks sleep at night. Pump housing on the way up, call bottom the whole way down. Yun & Liar have no credibility whatsoever.
Agreed, Ralph. And here's a possible explanation about sleeping at night:
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." -- Upton Sinclair
HREF="http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/u/uptonsincl138285.html">source
Well, I guess I can't follow HTML instructions well. The source of the quote is:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/u/uptonsincl138285.html
Ace,
I've seen that quote before. I was being sarcastic when I wrote that I did. On the other hand, I can also see why people take jobs that require them to take such positions: "You'll pay me how much to pump real estate? Ok!"
The NAR, real estate agents, and real estate agencies might not be tempted to pump the market if they had a legal obligation to represent their customers' best interests. The way the system is currently structured buyers must look out for themselves. A lawyer is much more useful for that than an agent.
(prior post of this removed to add one more word.)
What gets me is stories like this:
Husband is a developer, house construction guy, appraiser, or something like that.
Wife is a real estate agent, residential loan clerk, title search clerk, or something.
And then, you hear they have their own way-beyond-their-dual-salary bigass house, PLUS they have a half dozen houses they are trying to flip/rent-out/etc!!!!
Both incomes and ALL their debt, ALL their wealth, ALL their risk, in ONE INDUSTRY?
Do you know what DIVERSIFICATION means? Ever heard of the downside of LEVERAGE?
ESPECIALLY since they are in the industry, they should know there are CYCLES. And if they are in the sales side of the industry they should KNOW they are part of the HYPE and know they shouldn't drink their own toxic kool-aid!
No sympathy.
Post a Comment